C) IV B BOOU WA 7 Work in small groups. Discuss the questions. 1. Do you think that parents should treat their children as equal 2. What character traits do middle-aged people find irritating teenagers? 3. What character traits do teenagers find irritating in middle aged people 4. What can help build good relationships between the generations 5. Do you need to change some character traits in yourself or do you want your parents to accept you as you are? 6. Why do you think teenagers aren't given enough freedom while making their decisions?

Once upon a time there lived a King, Midas by name. He (1 WAS) a bit gloomy because he (2. LOVED) gold better than anything else, except his daughter. Midas (3. SPENT) days and often nights counting anxiously the pieces of gold he (4. COLLECTED или HAD COLLECTED). Once when he (5. WAS COUNTING) solemnly his money a stranger (6. ENTERED) the room. He (7. BENT) his head and (8. SAID): “Midas, (9. ARE) you really happy now that you (10. HAVE COLLECTED) so much gold which it (11. IS) difficult (12. TO WEIGH)?” “No,” (13. MUMBLED) Midas. “I WILL never (14. BE) happy until everything that I (15. TOUCH) (16. BECOMES) gold.”
“You shall have what you wish!” (17. PROMISED) the stranger.
The next morning while Midas (18. WAS DRESSING) he (19. NOTICED) that his clothes (20. TURNED) into gold. He (21. WENT) into the garden. He (22. WALKED) there for an hour and everything he (23. TOUCHED) (24. BECAME) gold at once. After he (25. WALKED) along his favourite path Midas (26. TURNED) to the house. Suddenly his daughter (27. CAME) in sight. It was clear she (28. HAD BEEN WORKING) in the garden for some time already as she (29. HAS PLANTED) a lot of flowers. She (30. RUN) to her father and (31. TOOK) his hand. She (32. TURNED) to gold at once. “What HAVE I (33. DONE)?” (34. CRIED) Midas. “I always (35. WANTED) more and more gold. I (36. DREAMT) about more riches. I (37. WAS) wrong Gold (38. IS) not the most important thing in the world. It HAS never (39. BEEN), it never will be.”

По-моему это просто упростили его слова, сделав фразу короче и понятнее

вот, что нашла за 30 минут поиска: 
Because if the territory were the meaning of the map, it would be impossible to say what the meaning of any particular map were if that map did not correspond to any territory -- i.e. any picture that could not be compared with what it was supposedly a picture of would be without meaning. - Поскольку, если бы территория была смыслом карты, невозможно было бы сказать, каково значение какой-либо конкретной карты, если бы эта карта не соответствовала какой-либо территории, то есть любая картина, которую нельзя было бы сравнить с тем, что она якобы была картина была бы без смысла.