PUBLISHED: 09:31 GMT, 15 October 2013 | UPDATED: 11:31 GMT, 15 October 2013
e-mail 66View commentsPeople living in rural areas of Britain are more optimistic about the future and happier about their quality of life than people in cities and towns, a new survey has found.
The Countryside Living Index carried out to record how people feel about their lives, found that the satisfaction ratings of people living in the countryside leapt by 10.7 per cent between the first and second quarters of 2013, with their views about the cost of living, education and crime all improving.
Country living (left) versus city life: people in rural areas are feeling more optimistic than their city counterparts
Meanwhile confidence about jobs and the economy fell 3.8 per cent in urban areas.
People in both rural and urban areas said that they felt more optimistic about health, education and the environment, but the positive change was much more pronounced among country-dwellers than city inhabitants.
RELATED ARTICLESPrevious12NextCameron has 'sympathy' for sheep farmers who want...Round up the Hampshire posse! Budget cuts force police to...Village greens at risk under new planning laws designed to...SHARE THIS ARTICLESharePeople from urban areas also said that they were increasingly more worried about crime than those in the countryside and overall the rise in perceived quality of life was three times higher in the countryside than in the cities.
Tim Price, rural affairs specialist at NFU Mutual, who carried out the study, said: 'The recession made life in the countryside very tough for many people, so it’s great news to see concerns about the cost of living easing.
'Over the last two years we have seen firms struggle to stay afloat. We think that many have only managed to survive thanks to innovative management combined with measures such as freezing fuel duty and support for small and medium-sized enterprises.
Many people choose to escape the bustling city life for the tranquility of the countryside
However, for young people the lack of rural jobs paying a living wage and high transport and housing costs continue to make it hard for them to live in the countryside, and we urge the Government to support this group to prevent country homes being affordable only for second homeowners and city commuters.'
Last week senior Conversative MP Graham Stuart claimed that rural areas were still suffering a serious 'injustice' in the amount of money they receive for local services.
He said that the coalition’s failure to address the shortfall in funding endured by councils in rural parts of the country was 'inexcusable'.
Stuart, MP for Beverley and Holderness, said that rural councils received around half the funding of their urban counterparts per head of population – a so-called 'rural penalty' – due to the way Government funding formulas work.
'The rural penalty of 50 per cent more per head going to urban areas is just not right,' Stuart told the Commons.
